Namun pada pasca Perang Dingin, NATO tetap melanjutkan ekspansinya walaupun terbukti adanya kekalahan Uni Soviet dan Pakta Warsawa. NATO merupakan salah satu kekuatan blok, yaitu blok barat yang dibentuk Amerika Serikat bersama dengan 12 negara-negara Eropa Barat lainnya bertujuan untuk membendung sikap ekspansif Uni Soviet pada masa Perang Dingin. Military doctrines, force posture and operational engagements (international operationsĮxercises) of the neutral and non-allied states’ armed forces from 1989 to 2004.Įvolusi NATO merupakan salah satu perkembangan terpenting dalam studi keamanan internasional. These arguments are demonstrated by systematically comparing the security policy and On the attempts of the Swiss government to transform Swiss military policy. Strategic culture was the strongest in Switzerland: this is because the institutions of directĭemocracy magnified the effect of the neutral strategic culture which could thus act as a veto Hampered by the neutral strategic culture held within the NNAS’ population. Operational level through its Partnership for Peace. Strategic levels whereas NATO contributed to the transformation of their armed forces at the Security and Defence Policy socialised the European non-allied states at the political and Security institutions (EU and NATO) and strategic culture. This thesis argues that these developments result from the combination of two variables: The Cold War? Three different strategic orientations are observed: power projection forĪustria and Sweden, power projection and territorial defence for Finland and domestic Should we account for the differences in the adaptation of the NNAS’ military policies after Policies of Austria, Finland, Sweden, and Switzerland after the Cold War? Secondly, how Firstly, what is the impact of neutrality on the military Towards a growing Europeanisation of their military policies. It also explains the Swiss reluctance to follow the European non-allied states’ path Policies – from territorial defence to crisis management – to the other non-neutral European In particular, it analyses whether Austria,įinland, Sweden and Switzerland (NNAS) embraced a similar paradigm shift in their military States after the Cold War from 1989-2004. This thesis analyses the evolution of the military policies of the European neutral and nonallied I come to the conclusion that despite the different approaches to Euro-Atlantic security among the leading actors, such as the U.S., France and Germany, the NATO-EU Strategic Partnership will likely continue with complementarity in security governance between these two institutions. In the last part of the study, the durability of the NATO-EU strategic partnership is questioned. In the second part, the NATO-EU Strategic Partnership and initiatives for stronger European military capabilities are explored. In the first part of the study, the security governance approach to NATO-EU inter-institutional relations is explained. On the contrary, I see such initiatives as an enhancer for implementing better practices of security governance. PESCO and the E2I have mostly been considered as a challenge to the U.S.-led Atlantic Alliance. Then, I question whether Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) and the European Intervention Initiative (E2I) have marked a drift away from complementarity. I empirically scrutinize the NATO-EU strategic partnership in the field of security governance. I specifically focus on whether the EU-NATO strategic partnership has led to the institutionalization of complementarity between the two institutions. This study examines the security governance between NATO and the EU. Three issues are examined to demonstrate the utility of the concept of security governance for understanding security in post-Cold War Europe: the transformation of NATO, the Europeanisation of security accomplished through EU-led initiatives and, finally, the resultant dynamic relationship between forms of exclusion and inclusion in governance. Based on an examination of the way governance is utilised in other political fields of political analysis, the article identifies the concept of security governance as involving the coordinated management and regulation of issues by multiple and separate authorities, the interventions of both public and private actors (depending upon the issue), formal and informal arrangements, in turn structured by discourse and norms, and purposefully directed toward particular policy outcomes. The validity of a governance approach lies in its ability to locate some of the distinctive ways in which European security has been coordinated, managed and regulated.
This article seeks to develop a concept of ‘security governance’ in the context of post-Cold War Europe.
0 kommentar(er)
